Why chip stocks need to keep cooking

Regular readers of this column will be well aware of its faith in the Philadelphia Semiconductor index, or SOX, as a valuable indicator, and after the summer stock market stumble the 30-stock benchmark is well and truly in the headlines. At its early-August low, the SOX had lost 25% of its value in just a month. It has since rebounded by a sixth. Given the SOX’s importance as both a guide to global activity and equity investors’ risk appetite, advisers and clients may find it worth their while to keep an eye on the index, as whether it rises or droops could have a major bearing on where stock markets go from here.

Growth industry

For those less familiar with the SOX, which comprises makers and designers of both silicon chips and semiconductor production equipment (SPE), it has a market following for two reasons.

“Worldwide chip sales are expected to reach nearly $600 billion in 2024 and semiconductors are everywhere, from tablets to laptops, cars to robots, smartphones to servers and smart meters to medical equipment.”

• First, by dint of their ubiquity, silicon chips offer a good insight to global economic activity. Worldwide chip sales are expected to reach nearly $600 billion in 2024 and semiconductors are everywhere, from tablets to laptops, cars to robots, smartphones to servers and smart meters to medical equipment.
• Second, the SOX has a decent history as a proxy for global risk appetite in financial markets. Chip and chip-making equipment firms are generally traded as momentum stocks, surging as earnings estimates rise and recoiling if they fall, thanks to how operationally geared they are: even a small percentage change in sales leads to a much bigger percentage change in profits, thanks to the fixed costs associated with research and development and, in some cases, the hugely capital-intensive nature of the business (a state-of-the-art semiconductor fabrication facility, or fab, now costs billions of dollars).

The SOX has received an extra kicker of late from both investors’ enthusiasm for Artificial Intelligence and companies’ scramble to invest in this new technology, in chipsets and data servers and centres. This can be seen most clearly, perhaps, in the form of NVIDIA and TSMC, two of the world’s ten largest companies by stock market value. NVIDIA designs its chipsets and then outsources their production to its Taiwanese manufacturing partner. If anything goes well, or amiss, at either, then stock markets may well take note. Advisers and clients are unlikely to have the time or inclination to get too heavily involved in the details of each individual stock, but both may have indirect exposure through index trackers and Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs), given the lofty weightings afforded to both names in a number of leading equity benchmarks, by virtue of their enormous stock market price tags.

Boom and bust

“Global silicon chip sales have shown an impressive 8% compound annual growth rate over the past 40-odd years, a figure which easily surpasses trend worldwide GDP growth. However, the industry is notoriously boom-and-bust.”

Global silicon chip sales have shown an impressive 8% compound annual growth rate over the past 40-odd years, a figure which easily surpasses trend worldwide GDP growth. However, the industry is notoriously boom-and-bust.

The silicon chip industry can be deceptively cyclical

Source: WSTS, SIA, Gartner

This is due to either, or a combination of:

• the rise and fall of new product cycles (such as mainframes, minicomputers, personal computers, mobile phones, smart phones, tablets, data servers, electric vehicles and so on); or
• the vagaries of the economic cycle and increases and decreases in consumer and corporate demand for gadgets and productivity-generating technology; or
• surges in supply as chipmakers over-invest in fresh capacity (and given the long lead times involved in fab construction it is very, very, very hard to calibrate increases in output).

Chip and pin

“The good news is that industry bodies such as the WSTS and SIA are forecasting 12% sales growth for the industry in 2024 and a similar rate of progress in 2025, to take industry revenues to a new all-time high, thanks in part to the AI boom, hopes for iPhone16 and ongoing economic growth.”

The good news is that industry bodies such as the WSTS and SIA are forecasting 12% sales growth for the industry in 2024 and a similar rate of progress in 2025, to take industry revenues to a new all-time high, thanks in part to the AI boom, hopes for iPhone16 and ongoing economic growth. A ‘hard’ landing, or unexpected economic slowdown, could upend those forecasts, as could any equally unforeseen slowdown in AI-related investment.

Such a reverse seems unlikely now – but it is not without precedent.

Those with long memories will remember the tech, media and telecoms bubble of 1998-2000, which was largely driven by 3G mobile technology, the internet and improved broadband technology, and increased data capacity.

The internet and 3G delivered far more than anyone dared dream at the time, but the bubble still burst in 2000-02 when an investment boom turned into a near-term investment bust, as the initial scramble for supply turned into a pause as buyers digested what they had bought and sought to make a return on it. Stocks like Cisco, Microsoft, Intel, Apple and Oracle, ‘good’ companies with a strong narrative and market leading positions, plunged by anywhere between 65% and 90% as their lofty valuations proved unsustainable – and they were firms whose business models proved robust. Those whose were not inflicted even greater pain on their shareholders, while it took a decade or more for investors to get their money back.

“Note the current market action in the SOX index, in the form of the summer pullback and rebound and compare it to the five-year period of 1996-2000 and how the index saw two or three major but failed rallies before gravity took hold.”

The past is no guarantee for the future, but this is something even the most bullish advisers and clients should at least consider, in the context of their overall exposure to US equities and technology stocks, especially when they look at some the valuations that currently prevail and the growth forecasts they imply over a very long period of time. And the SOX, again, could be a guide. Note the current market action in the SOX index, in the form of the summer pullback and rebound and compare it to the five-year period of 1996-2000 and how the index saw two or three major but failed rallies before gravity took hold. Bulls will want to see new peaks reached quickly. Bears will be waiting for a sequence of lower peaks as their sign that the times may be changing.

SOX index is rallying after a sudden swoon this summer

Source: LSEG Refinitiv data

Failed rallies in the SOX helped call the top in 2000 as the TMT bubble popped

Source: LSEG Refinitiv data

Past performance is not a guide to future performance and some investments need to be held for the long term.