globe with interconnecting lines

Which assets, sectors and stocks have done best in the three years since Pfizer Monday?

5 months ago

On 9 November 2020, Pfizer and BioNTech announced they had developed a vaccine for COVID-19 and share prices surged around the world, even if they had already bottomed in the spring after a short, sharp correction.

Investors are now showing Pfizer and BioNTech precious little gratitude, because their share prices are languishing, and the overall investment landscape looks very different now three years on. Commodities have outperformed equities and equities have outperformed bonds. Advisers and clients must now assess why, and then decide whether these trends are set to continue or not.

A new hope

Pfizer and BioNTech may have won the undying gratitude of pretty much everyone when they made their announcement three years ago (bar anti-vaxxers), but the world has now moved on from facemasks and lockdowns, even if hybrid working is still with us and governments are encouraging their people to take top-up jabs.

Pfizer’s latest quarterly results (31 October) were noticeable for a big drop in revenues and $5.6 billion in inventory write-downs, both related to lower demand for COVID vaccines, and BioNTech cut its guidance for 2023 when it reported its own third-quarter numbers (6 November). Both shares have given back all of the ground they gained in 2020 and 2021 (and more).

Pfizer and BioNTech have lost all of their post-2020 share price gains

Source: Refinitiv data

The economic outlook has changed, too. Massive fiscal stimulus programmes and COVID-19 relief measures, coupled with additional monetary support in the form of zero interest rates and further quantitative easing (QE) resulted, as it turned out, in too much money chasing too few assets and too few goods, with the result that inflation finally reared its head, after 40 years of lying dormant. Asset bubbles formed and the price of goods and services soared, helped along the way by the war in Ukraine and the subsequent spike in oil and commodity prices and further damage to global supply chains.

Spooked central banks had to switch course, raise interest rates and, in many cases, launch Quantitative Tightening schemes, to cool economies, money supply and ultimately inflation.

New sensation

“The world looks and feels very different from November 2020 and asset prices reflect this new reality. Since Pfizer Monday, commodities have done better than equities and equities have done better than bonds.”

The world looks and feels very different from November 2020 and asset prices reflect this new reality.

Since Pfizer Monday, commodities have done better than equities and equities have done better than bonds. Bitcoin has surged, buoyed by the search for assets with a finite or slow-growing supply, or at least something that central banks could not print or just conjure out of thin air. Meanwhile, the era of zero interest rate policies (ZIRP) seems to be over.

Commodities up and bonds routed since Pfizer Monday

Source: Refinitiv data, from 9 November 2020 to 9 November 2023

The end of that 13-year experiment with ZIRP and QE, not surprisingly, means that what worked from an investment point of view during that period – bonds, long-duration assets like technology, growth stocks – has found the going tougher since its end.

Conversely, investment options which had done poorly – commodities, cyclicals, value – have tried to stage a comeback and companies which revelled in cheap debt or financial engineering have come unstuck and firms with sound balance sheets and rising interest income have thrived.

Sector switch

“Note how the unloved, derided FTSE 100 – packed with miners, oils, banks, insurers and consumer staples – has outperformed the technology- and bio-tech-laden NASDAQ Composite over the past three years.”

Note how the unloved, derided FTSE 100 – packed with miners, oils, banks, insurers and consumer staples – has outperformed the technology- and bio-tech-laden NASDAQ Composite over the past three years.

FTSE 100 has outperformed the NASDAQ since Pfizer Monday

Source: Refinitiv data, from 9 November 2020 to 9 November 2023

By sector, within the FTSE 350, commodity plays such as oil and industrial metals have done well (given a helping hand by the exclusion of Russian supply from global markets), while banks have revelled in a period of rising interest rates and improved net interest margins. An economic recovery post-lockdown has been welcomed by Industrial Transportation firms, consumer-facing companies and also aerospace firms, as global tourism picks up. (Defence stocks have also gained a boost from conflicts in both Ukraine and the Middle East.)

Best and worst performing FTSE sector indices since Pfizer Monday

Source: Sharepad. Capital return from 9 November 2020 to 9 November 2023

The way ahead

Advisers and clients must now decide whether inflation and higher interest rates are with us to stay or not. Growth stocks do not seem entirely sure, given how well America’s Magnificent Seven of Alphabet, Amazo, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, NVIDIA and Tesla are doing in 2023 and how the S&P 500 Growth index is refusing to give way to the S&P 500 Value index, after the latter’s attempt to assert itself in 2022.

The relative performance of these two benchmarks could yet provide a valuable clue as to how the macroeconomic, policy and market outlook will develop from here, and whether the world really is going to look very different in the 2020s from how it looked in the 2010s, from an investment point of view.

Growth investing refuses to cede to value-driven approaches

Source: Refinitiv data

“Another relationship which could give a strong hint as to whether we are in a brave new world that favours value, cyclicals and commodities over growth, technology and bonds is the one between the Bloomberg Commodity index and the FTSE All-World equity benchmark.”

Another relationship which could give a strong hint as to whether we are in a brave new world that favours value, cyclicals and commodities over growth, technology and bonds is the one between the Bloomberg Commodity index and the FTSE All-World equity benchmark. Commodities outperformed in the 2000s, equities in the 2010s and raw materials look to have started a fightback in the 2020s.

Commodities are having a good go at outperforming equities

Source: Refinitiv data, from 9 November 2020 to 9 November 2023

Past performance is not a guide to future performance and some investments need to be held for the long term.

Author
Profile Picture
Russ Mould
Name

Russ Mould

Job Title
AJ Bell Investment Director

Russ Mould’s long experience of the capital markets began in 1991 when he became a Fund Manager at a leading provider of life insurance, pensions and asset management services. In 1993 he joined a prestigious investment bank, working as an Equity Analyst covering the technology sector for 12 years. Russ eventually joined Shares magazine in November 2005 as Technology Correspondent and became Editor of the magazine in July 2008. Following the acquisition of Shares' parent company, MSM Media, by AJ Bell Group, he was appointed as AJ Bell’s Investment Director in summer 2013.

Financial adviser verification

This area of the website is intended for financial advisers and other financial professionals only. If you are a customer of AJ Bell Investcentre, please click ‘Go to the customer area’ below. 

We will remember your preference, so you should only be asked to select the appropriate website once per device.

Scroll to Top