Keys in door

Why LISA charges should stay at reduced rates

4 months ago

As lockdown lingers on, more and more people in the UK are facing financial turmoil created by the COVID-19 outbreak. Since March, there has been a steady stream of HMRC and DWP announcements, all designed to help people, businesses, and the economy in these times.

HMRC recently announced the charge on Lifetime ISAs (LISAs) will be temporarily reduced from 25% to 20% for withdrawals between 6 March 2020 and 5 April 2021. LISAs were launched in April 2017 to help those under 40 save for either a first home or retirement. People can save up to £4,000 a year, and the Government adds a 25% bonus. Unless the individual is withdrawing the money to buy a house or after they are over 60 (or because of death or terminal illness), there’s a 25% charge on all other withdrawals which recoups the Government bonus plus 6.25% of the member’s subscriptions.

I have always felt this charge is deeply unfair. It was presented as a 25% Government bonus on the way in, and a 25% charge on the way out. To most people that sounds even. But, of course, it isn’t. LISA investors losing some of the money they invested simply for withdrawing funds other than in tightly controlled circumstances acts as a disincentive for saving. Reducing the charge to 20% means only recouping the Government bonus (plus any growth on that).

For anyone withdrawing funds from a LISA over the next 11 months, the charge will simply reduce to 20%. But for those who have already withdrawn funds since 6 March, it’s more complicated.

Most people who have requested a withdrawal since this date will have already received their funds back into their bank account (the LISA provider would have paid the 25% charge). LISA managers now can claim back the difference between a 25% charge and a 20% charge from HMRC, and credit it back into the investor’s LISA, as long as the LISA is still open. Those people who were expecting cash in hand from this refund are in for a shock. Instead, if they want the refunded money in their pocket, they will have to make another withdrawal equalling the amount of the refunded charge. But this, of course, will be reduced by another 20% charge.

If the LISA was closed when the withdrawal was made, then the LISA provider can pay the refunded amount directly to the individual. Of course, this means these individuals won’t suffer a 20% charge on that amount.

Paying the refunded charge back into the LISA is complicated, especially as the client doesn’t immediately have access to the money. It would have been far easier for HMRC to refund all clients, either directly or via the LISA provider, regardless of whether the LISA was still open or not.

It’s excellent news HMRC is responding quickly to help people. And reducing this charge will help people financially at a time when they really need it. But I hope this change isn’t only a temporary measure – and instead HMRC changes its stance and makes the 20% charge a permanent feature of LISAs.

This article was previously published by Retirement Planner.

Profile Picture
Rachel Vahey

Rachel Vahey

Job Title
Senior Technical Consultant

Rachel is a Senior Technical Consultant helping financial advisers and planners understand the changing pensions and savings environment, as well as how new legislation and regulation affects them and their clients. She’s well known within the pensions and savings industry, and regularly speaks at AJ Bell events, alongside writing content and articles for our website.

Financial adviser verification

This area of the website is intended for financial advisers and other financial professionals only. If you are a customer of AJ Bell Investcentre, please click ‘Go to the customer area’ below. 

We will remember your preference, so you should only be asked to select the appropriate website once per device.

Scroll to Top